Utile Et Dulce : a response to Noël Carroll
Document Type
Journal article
Source Publication
British Journal of Aesthetics
Publication Date
2006
Volume
46
Issue
3
First Page
274
Last Page
281
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Abstract
In response to Noël Carroll's criticisms of my essay on C. I. Lewis's conception of aesthetic experience, I discuss reasons given in support of axiological accounts of aesthetic experience, including Lewis's contentions about the intrinsic valence of all experiences and his emphasis on the interests motivating philosophical classifications of experience. I also respond to Carroll's remarks about a possible explanatory requirement on a conception of aesthetic experience and the idea that artists have aesthetic experiences as they make a work of art.
DOI
10.1093/aesthj/ayl005
Print ISSN
00070904
E-ISSN
14682842
Publisher Statement
Copyright © British Society of Aesthetics 2006
Access to external full text or publisher's version may require subscription.
Full-text Version
Publisher’s Version
Language
English
Recommended Citation
Livingston, P. (2006). Utile Et Dulce: A response to Noël Carroll. British Journal of Aesthetics, 46(3), 274-281. doi: 10.1093/aesthj/ayl005