其他篇名 Alternative Title
A reinvestigation of the case of Zhong Hui Slandering Ji Kang based on analyses of historical materials in A New Account of Tales of the World
摘要 Abstract
以鍾會爲個案，探討《世説新語》獨特的編撰體例、編撰思想及其對歷史人物的獨到品鑒與書寫，體現出不同於《三國志》《晋書》等史籍而自成一家之言的可貴價值。在以往研究中，鍾會被誤認爲進讒言而誅殺嵇康，成爲嵇康之死的直接推動者，被後世披以惡名，今以《世説新語》對鍾會的幾則記載爲例，參驗以其他典籍，可知鍾會之惡名實多爲誤解或誤讀。我們以“了解之同情”，重回歷史現場，以《世説新語》文本記載爲基點，對鍾會生平及行事，細加考索，可以了解到鍾會才學過人，“不是什麽不知義理的武人”（吕思勉語），其行事舉止、社會聲譽，總體而言，皆有令名，《世説新語》所載大抵契合當時實況。而後世對鍾會所責之惡名，宜有所釐正。
This article reinvestigates the case of Zhong Hui slandering Ji Kang and discusses A New Account of Tales of the World’s unique compilation style and philosophy and its appreciation and representation of historical figures, which illustrate its stand-alone value different from that of Annals of the Three Kingdoms and Book of Jin. Previous research has argued that Zhong Hui’s slander was the direct cause of Ji Kang’s death and has drawn critiques to the former. This article reads the records about Zhong Hui in A New Account of Tales of the World with references to other classical texts for a better understanding of this historical figure who has been misunderstood and whose notoriety resulted from misreading. This article revisits historical scenes and analyzes Zhong Hui’s biographical details as recorded in A New Account of Tales of the World. As Lü Simian pointed out, Zhong Hui was “not a warrior who knows no reasons.” Zhong Hui’s fame drew on his talent, actions, and social reputation, which are mostly consistent with the records in A New Account of Tales of the World.
關鍵詞 Keywords
《世説新語》, 《晋書》, 鍾會, 嵇康, 周邊人物, A New Account of Tales of the World, Book of Jin, Zhong Hui, Ji Kang
語言 Language
Chinese (Traditional)
版權聲明 Copyright Statement
香港嶺南大學中文系(編)，上海古籍出版社(出版)
共享創意條款 Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
參考書目格式 Recommended Citation
鍾書林 (2023)。鍾會讒殺嵇康公案的再審視——對《世説新語》史料的分梳。《嶺南學報》，復刊 第十九輯，頁145-162。檢自 https://commons.ln.edu.hk/ljcs_new/vol19/iss1/8