其他篇名 Alternative Title
Dai Zhen’s studies on Shangshu (Book of Documents) and their significance in the history of Chinese scholarship
摘要 Abstract
戴震《尚書》學研究貫穿其學術的前後期。乾隆二十二年（1757）之前是其学术研究前期，主要著作有《尚書今文古文考》《經考》等。乾隆二十二年（1757）之後是其學術研究的後期，代表作爲《尚書義考》，其成書最早不過乾隆二十七年（1762）冬。《尚書今文古文考》簡明扼要地勾勒出漢代《尚書》今古文源流；《尚書義考》雖未成書，但其義例之謹嚴，當爲世人所重。戴震的學術研究遵循“以聲音求文字，由文字求訓詁，以訓詁求典章制度，由典章制度求義理”的學術路徑，並貫徹“以詞通道”的研經原則，垂範後世。
Dai Zhen’s studies on Shangshu (Book of Documents) lasted throughout his scholarship. His earlier works (before 1757, the 22nd year of Qianlong’s reign) include Shangshu jinwen guwen kao (On the Old Text and the New Text of the Book of Documents) and Jing kao (Examinations of the Classics). Shangshu yikao (Explanation of the Meanings of the Book of Documents) is the representative work of his later scholarship (after 1757, the 22nd year of Qianlong’s reign). He appeared to have written Shangshu yikao no earlier than the winter of 1762 (the 27th year of Qianlong’s reign). Shangshu jinwen guwen kao concisely outlines old and new sources of Han-dynasty Shangshu. Although Shangshu yikao had not been compiled into a volume during his lifetime, his citations therein are rigorous and well-respected. Dai Zhen’s scholarship followed this path: to understand characters through the sound; to pursue exegesis through characters; to grasp the system of codes and rules of governance through exegesis; to arrive at principles of things by examining codes and rules of governance) and observes the principle of yi ci tong dao (to pursue the way through words).
關鍵詞 Keywords
戴震, 《尚書》學, “光被四表”說, 《尚書義考》, 以詞通道, Dai Zhen, Book of Documents, Shangshu yikao (Explanation of the Meanings of the Book of Documents), guangbeisibiao (lofty virtues reach far-off), yi ci tong dao (to pursue the way through words)
語言 Language
Chinese (Traditional)
版權聲明 Copyright Statement
香港嶺南大學中文系(編)，上海古籍出版社(出版)
共享創意條款 Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
參考書目格式 Recommended Citation
趙成傑 (2023)。戴震《尚書》學著述考論 : 兼論其學術史意義。《嶺南學報》，復刊 第十八輯，頁189-217。檢自 https://commons.ln.edu.hk/ljcs_new/vol18/iss1/8
備註 Additional Information
本文係國家社科基金西部項目“清人筆記所見《尚書》類文獻整理與研究”(18XZS005）階段性成果。審稿專家對本文提出了詳實而有針對性的修改意見，吉林大學趙朝陽博士亦對本文悉心指正，特此致謝。