Utile Et Dulce : a response to Noël Carroll

Document Type

Journal article

Source Publication

British Journal of Aesthetics

Publication Date

2006

Volume

46

Issue

3

First Page

274

Last Page

281

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Abstract

In response to Noël Carroll's criticisms of my essay on C. I. Lewis's conception of aesthetic experience, I discuss reasons given in support of axiological accounts of aesthetic experience, including Lewis's contentions about the intrinsic valence of all experiences and his emphasis on the interests motivating philosophical classifications of experience. I also respond to Carroll's remarks about a possible explanatory requirement on a conception of aesthetic experience and the idea that artists have aesthetic experiences as they make a work of art.

DOI

10.1093/aesthj/ayl005

Print ISSN

00070904

E-ISSN

14682842

Publisher Statement

Copyright © British Society of Aesthetics 2006

Access to external full text or publisher's version may require subscription.

Full-text Version

Publisher’s Version

Language

English

Recommended Citation

Livingston, P. (2006). Utile Et Dulce: A response to Noël Carroll. British Journal of Aesthetics, 46(3), 274-281. doi: 10.1093/aesthj/ayl005

Share

COinS