Factors influencing intention to continue volunteering : a study of older Chinese in Hong Kong
Document Type
Journal article
Source Publication
Journal of Social Service Research
Publication Date
1-1-2006
Volume
32
Issue
4
First Page
193
Last Page
209
Keywords
Older volunteerism, older Chinese, retention of older volunteers
Abstract
Objective: We extended the volunteer process model (Omoto & Snyder, 1995) to identify factors influencing the persistence of volunteer activities in older Chinese.
Method: We individually interviewed 318 older Chinese volunteers about their demographic information, history of volunteer activities, subjective health status, perceived social support, motivation for volunteering, integration into volunteer group, satisfaction from volunteer work, and intention to continue volunteering in the coming year.
Results: Bivariate correlation analyses generally supported the volunteer process model. In particular, intention to continue volunteering was related to antecedent factors of high educational attainment, mental well-being, social support, and fulfillment of altruistic and self-oriented motives as well as volunteer experiences of integration into the volunteer group and satisfaction with volunteer work. Results of amultiple regression analysis indicated that fulfillment of self-oriented motives was the most salient factor in predicting the persistence of volunteer activities when shared variances of various factors were also considered.
Discussion: Research and practical implications were discussed to facilitate the retention of older Chinese volunteers.
DOI
10.1300/J079v32n04_11
Print ISSN
01488376
E-ISSN
15407314
Publisher Statement
Copyright © 2006 by The Haworth Press, Inc
Access to external full text or publisher's version may require subscription.
Full-text Version
Publisher’s Version
Language
English
Recommended Citation
Cheung, F. Y. l., Tang, C. S. K., & Yan, E. C. W. (2006). Factors influencing intention to continue volunteering: A study of older Chinese in Hong Kong. Journal of Social Service Research, 32(4), 193-209. doi: 10.1300/J079v32n04_11