Susan Sontag, battle language and the Hong Kong SARS outbreak of 2003

Document Type

Journal article

Source Publication

Economy and Society

Publication Date

2006

Volume

35

Issue

1

First Page

42

Last Page

64

Publisher

Routledge

Keywords

disease, language, SARS, Susan Sontag, war

Abstract

The widespread use of military language to describe modern epidemics is often attributed to the popularization of the germ theory of disease. Whatever its origins, critics regularly deplore martial imagery in the medical context finding it by turns dangerous, humiliating, and offensive. This article examines the most famous of these critiques, Susan Sontag's rebuttal of disease-as-war language, and finds it problematic in a number of respects. Mass emergency response to the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) outbreak in Hong Kong in 2003 offers a cross-cultural case study in the use of representations of war. Key to the argument is the proposition that disease-as-war language expresses something ‘real’ not illusory, vital not frivolous, about the community which employs it. The language is a vehicle for articulating social emotions of collective fear, patriotism, homage, and exculpation in conditions that presage collective death.

DOI

10.1080/03085140500465840

Print ISSN

03085147

E-ISSN

14695766

Publisher Statement

Copyright © 2006 Taylor & Francis

Access to external full text or publisher's version may require subscription.

Full-text Version

Publisher’s Version

Language

English

Recommended Citation

Baehr, P. (2006). Susan Sontag, battle language and the Hong Kong SARS outbreak of 2003. Economy and Society, 35(1), 42-64. doi: 10.1080/03085140500465840

Share

COinS