Title

Intervention, determinism, and the causal minimality condition

Document Type

Journal article

Source Publication

Synthese

Publication Date

10-1-2011

Volume

182

Issue

3

First Page

335

Last Page

347

Keywords

Causation, Causal Bayesian network, Determinism, Markov condition, Intervention, Probability

Abstract

We clarify the status of the so-called causal minimality condition in the theory of causal Bayesian networks, which has received much attention in the recent literature on the epistemology of causation. In doing so, we argue that the condition is well motivated in the interventionist (or manipulability) account of causation, assuming the causal Markov condition which is essential to the semantics of causal Bayesian networks. Our argument has two parts. First, we show that the causal minimality condition, rather than an add-on methodological assumption of simplicity, necessarily follows from the substantive interventionist theses, provided that the actual probability distribution is strictly positive. Second, we demonstrate that the causal minimality condition can fail when the actual probability distribution is not positive, as is the case in the presence of deterministic relationships. But we argue that the interventionist account still entails a pragmatic justification of the causal minimality condition. Our argument in the second part exemplifies a general perspective that we think commendable: when evaluating methods for inferring causal structures and their underlying assumptions, it is relevant to consider how the inferred causal structure will be subsequently used for counterfactual reasoning.

DOI

10.1007/s11229-010-9751-1

Print ISSN

00397857

E-ISSN

15730964

Publisher Statement

Copyright © 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

Access to external full text or publisher's version may require subscription.

Full-text Version

Publisher’s Version

Recommended Citation

Zhang, J., & Spirtes, P. (2011). Intervention, determinism, and the causal minimality condition. Synthese, 182(3), 335-347. doi: 10.1007/s11229-010-9751-1