Title

Grounding : necessary or contingent?

Document Type

Journal article

Source Publication

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly

Publication Date

12-1-2013

Volume

94

Issue

4

First Page

465

Last Page

485

Publisher

Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Abstract

Recent interest in the nature of grounding is due in part to the idea that purely modal notions are too coarse-grained to capture what we have in mind when we say that one thing is grounded in another. Grounding not being purely modal in character, however, is compatible with it having modal consequences. Is grounding a necessary relation? In this article I argue that the answer is 'yes' in the sense that propositions corresponding to full grounds modally entail propositions corresponding to what they ground. The argument proceeds upon two substantive principles: the first is that there is a broadly epistemic constraint on grounding, while the second links this constraint with Fine's Aristotelian notion of essence. Many think grounding is necessary in something like the sense specified above, but just why it's necessary is an issue that hasn't been carefully addressed. If my argument is successful, we now know why grounding is necessary.

DOI

10.1111/papq.12009

Print ISSN

02790750

E-ISSN

14680114

Publisher Statement

Copyright © 2013 The Author. Access to external full text or publisher's version may require subscription.

Full-text Version

Publisher’s Version

Recommended Citation

Trogdon, K. (2014). Grounding: Necessary or contingent? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 94(4), 465-485. doi: 10.1111/papq.12009

Share

COinS