Title

Kuhn versus Popper on science education : a response to Richard Bailey

Document Type

Journal article

Source Publication

Learning for Democracy

Publication Date

10-1-2006

Volume

2

Issue

3

First Page

45

Last Page

52

Abstract

In a recent contribution to Learning for Democracy, Richard Bailey argues that Thomas Kuhn advocated an indoctrinatory model of science education, which is fundamentally authority-based. While agreeing with Bailey’s conclusion, this article suggests that Kuhn was attempting to solve an important problem which Bailey only touches on – how to ensure that science students do not become hypercritical. It continues by offering a critical rationalist solution to this problem, arguing that paradigms qua exemplars should be historical problem-solving episodes, rather than model solutions to puzzles.

Print ISSN

17434912

Publisher Statement

Copyright © 2006 Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville

Recommended Citation

Rowbottom, D. P. (2006). Kuhn versus Popper on science education: A response to Richard Bailey. Learning for Democracy, 2(3), 45-52.

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS