Title

Worker sorting and job satisfaction : the case of union and government jobs

Document Type

Journal article

Source Publication

Industrial and Labor Relations Review

Publication Date

7-1-2002

Volume

55

Issue

4

First Page

595

Last Page

609

Abstract

In initial cross-section estimates using data from the 1991-94 British Household Panel Study, the authors find that union members had lower overall job satisfaction than non-union members, and public sector workers had higher satisfaction than private sector workers. Controlling for individual worker effects (sorting) using panel methods confirms the lower satisfaction of union members, but eliminates the higher satisfaction of public sector workers. These results suggest that unions do not simply attract the dissatisfied, as previously suggested. By contrast, the greater satisfaction expressed by public sector workers seems largely a consequence of sorting, with those who are more easily satisfied being drawn to the public sector. Additional analysis of particular aspects of satisfaction, including satisfaction with pay, the work itself, and relations with the boss, generally supports these conclusions.

DOI

10.2307/3270624

Print ISSN

00197939

E-ISSN

2162271X

Publisher Statement

Copyright © by Cornell University

Access to external full text or publisher's version may require subscription.

Full-text Version

Publisher’s Version

Recommended Citation

Heywood, J. S., Siebert, W. S., & Wei, X. (2002). Worker sorting and job satisfaction: The case of union and government jobs. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 55(4), 595-609. doi: 10.2307/3270624