Mitigating liabilities of foreignness : defensive versus offensive approaches
Journal of International Management
Contract, Liability of foreignness, Networking
Finding effective mechanisms that can overcome liabilities of foreignness (LOFs) is the central issue in the study of LOFs. This study proposes that such mechanisms comprise defensive options and offensive options. Defensive mechanisms include contract protection, parental control, parental service, and output standardization. Offensive mechanisms include local networking, resource commitment, legitimacy improvement, and input localization. Using China as an analytical setting, this study emphasizes two prominent yet distinct mechanisms: contract protection and local networking ("guanxi" in Chinese). Contracts and guanxi mitigate the LOF via different paths: Contracts negate LOFs by safeguarding invested resources, curtailing operational uncertainty, and reducing coordination costs, whereas guanxi neutralizes LOFs through increasing indigenous adaptability, improving organizational legitimacy, and heightening cooperation with the local business community. Our analysis of 92 sample MNEs in China suggests that contracts and guanxi exert different influences on the consequences of LOFs. Contracts reduce production and marketing costs but do not stimulate sales revenues. Guanxi, however, enhances sales revenues but does not reduce production and marketing costs. This study also documents that contracts and guanxi operate as complements in overcoming LOFs.
Copyright © 2002 Elsevier Science Inc
Access to external full text or publisher's version may require subscription.
Luo, Y., Shenkar, O., & Nyaw, M.-K. (2002). Mitigating liabilities of foreignness: Defensive versus offensive approaches. Journal of International Management, 8(3), 283-300. doi: 10.1016/S1075-4253(02)00073-X