Ubiquitous but arbitrary iconicity
Document Type
Journal article
Source Publication
Semiotica
Publication Date
5-23-2014
Volume
135
First Page
119
Last Page
135
Publisher
De Gruyter Mouton
Abstract
This paper addresses the issue of iconicity, which is largely neglected by Saussure for playing only a minor role in language. What it tries to show through ample examples is that iconicity exists at every level of language, but more importantly and contrary to popular belief, that the motivatedness of indices and icons does not in any way contradict the notion of the arbitrariness of the sign. This paper addresses the issue of iconicity, which is largely neglected by Saussure for playing only a minor role in language. What it tries to show through ample examples is that iconicity exists at every level of language, but more importantly and contrary to popular belief, that the motivatedness of indices and icons does not in any way contradict the notion of the arbitrariness of the sign.
DOI
10.1515/sem-2014-0013
Print ISSN
00371998
Publisher Statement
Access to external full text or publisher's version may require subscription.
Full-text Version
Publisher’s Version
Language
English
Recommended Citation
DING, E. (2014).Ubiquitous but arbitrary iconicity. Semiotica, 200, 119-135.